RESEARCH ARTICLE


Screen-based Simulation Supporting Problem-based Learning to Improve Football Tactics



Teng Jia1, Jirarat Sitthiworachart1, *, John Morris1
1 King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, School of Industrial Education and Technology, Bangkok, Thailand


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 141
Abstract HTML Views: 55
PDF Downloads: 74
ePub Downloads: 50
Total Views/Downloads: 320
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 98
Abstract HTML Views: 51
PDF Downloads: 68
ePub Downloads: 49
Total Views/Downloads: 266



Creative Commons License
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, School of Industrial Education and Technology, Bangkok, Thailand; E-mail: jirarat.si@kmitl.ac.th


Abstract

Introduction

This study measured the effect of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) with Screen-Based Simulation (SBS) on undergraduate football tactical decision-making, tactical skills, and student engagement. The Screen-Based Simulation showed tactical scenarios in real games to learners, promoting the identification and analysis of tactical problems in learning. Problem-Based Learning enabled learners to get a deeper understanding of the tactical problems and discuss them effectively.

Materials and Methods

Two simulation tools were used in this study. The first one, ‘football match basic offensive and defensive tactical simulation experiment platform,’ is scaffolding in football tactics teaching. Students could use the simulation platform to find tactical problems and learn tactics. The second one, TacticUP, is a screen-based simulation tool to test football tactical decision-making. We used second-year students majoring in physical education at a Chinese university. Seventy-nine students were divided into an experimental group using PBL-SBS and a group taught traditionally. Before the experiment, the tactical decision-making of both groups was assessed in a pretest, and at the end of the six-week experiment, the students were tested again. They also completed a questionnaire on tactical skills and student engagement.

Results

There was no significant difference between the pretest scores on tactical decision-making between the two groups (independent-sample t-test, sig = 0.997 > 0.05). However, after the experiment, significantly better improvement was observed in tactical decision-making in the experimental group. The pretest mean score (59) was significantly lower than the post-test one (67) on a scale of 100 (paired sample t-test, sig <0.01). ANOVA showed that the experimental group performed better in all aspects, namely tactical decision-making, tactical skill, and student engagement, than the traditional group (Sig values were all less than 0.01).

Conclusion

Compared with traditional teaching, PPL-SBS students performed better in tactical decision-making, tactical skills, and student engagement than students in the traditional teaching group.

Keywords: Problem-based learning, Screen-based simulation, Student engagement, Decision-making, Tactical skills, Football tactics.